| Confusing Times for
    Women on Health Issues.  [United States] In the topsy-turvy world of women's
    health, Frenchie Perry has thrown up her hands.  Hormones were good, then bad, now
    good again.  Then experts fought over fat.  Now she hears they're reconsidering
    the bone-strengthening powers of calcium.  ``I think now, you don't know what to
    think,'' said the 63-year-old Palo Altan, shaking her head.  ``You're on your own.''
      It's been a dizzying month for women after a series of major studies
seemed to
    contradict traditional thinking about how to stay healthy.  Among the headlines:
    Low-fat diets may not significantly lower the risk of heart disease or some
cancers.
      Exercise might not change your chances of getting colon cancer. 
 Taking
    estrogen doesn't up the odds of heart disease, if you've had a hysterectomy.
  And the
    chalky calcium pills may be for naught: They don't appear to help prevent broken bones. | 
  
    | Sorting
    Out the Results for Women.  [United States] The landmark Women's Health
    Initiative led to a sea change in doctors' and women's attitudes toward post
menopausal
    hormone therapy.  Approximately 27,000 women participated in the initiative's trials
    of estrogen alone and estrogen plus progestin.  Here are some bottom-line
    recommendations for postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative:
 No woman
    should go on hormone therapy to prevent heart disease.  Hormone-therapy
 products
    effectively treat moderate-to-severe hot flashes and night sweats and vaginal dryness in
    menopausal women.  If concerned about osteoporosis after menopause, women should talk
    to a doctor about taking medications other than hormone therapy to protect their bones.
     Don't go on hormone therapy to prevent memory loss or Alzheimer's disease. | 
  
    | Women
    May Not Be Ready for Change, Despite Initiative Studies.  [United States] Diane
    Parker, 54, may have been surprised this month by research reversing long-held advice to
    middle-aged women on the health benefits of taking calcium supplements and eating low-fat
    diets.  She wasn't fazed by it.  Parker, an Elliott, Maine 
realtor, is among the
    target audience of the $725 million Women's Health Initiative, begun by the
U.S. in 1993
    to determine if lifestyle choices can prevent heart disease, cancer and other ills.
     Upending accepted wisdom, the study last week reported that extra calcium in the
    diet won't prevent bone-weakening that can cripple elderly women.  The
previous week,
    another analysis from the same study of 161,000 middle-aged American women found that
    reducing fat consumption won't lower the risk of heart disease.  What's
 a woman to
    do?  ``I mostly listen to my gynecologist, not my television,'' said Parker, who has
    an undergraduate degree in chemistry and a master's in biology from Johns Hopkins 
University
    in Baltimore. 
 ``I try not get overwhelmed by health news or the latest fads.'' | 
  
    | Hormone
    Therapy: Making Educated Guesses.  [United States] 2002, researchers warned
    millions of older women that postmenopausal hormone pills were likely doing
them more harm
    than good.  That study, the massive Women's Health Initiative, panicked
 many women
    into tossing out their hormones.  Now, researchers are poring over that
 - and newer -
    data to refine their understanding of the risks and benefits of hormones, especially for
    women who start taking hormones right at menopause, not a decade or so later.  Two
    studies published over the last few weeks and aimed at better understanding
the role
    hormones play in heart disease are the first salvos in that scientific effort.  Both
    found that starting estrogen therapy at menopause did not increase the risk
of heart
    problems, while starting later in life does increase risk.  In fact, there's a chance
    estrogen may even protect the hearts of those who take it early.  Two more studies
    are now enrolling women close to the age of menopause to explore the issue further.
     It's increasingly clear that "a woman's age, or more specifically, the time
    since menopause, is an important factor in terms of heart outcomes on hormone
    therapy," said Dr. JoAnn Manson, chief of the Division of Preventive Medicine at
    Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. 
 Why would the timing of hormones make such a
    difference?  Because estrogen plays an important role in preventing some of the
    age-related buildup of plaque in artery walls. | 
  
    | Women's Health: A Little
    Progress.  [United 
States] Reading the latest reports about the
 possible medical
    benefits of estrogen therapy during menopause could produce symptoms of whiplash.  
    Women who were earlier told estrogen therapy might cause strokes now read that it could
    protect some younger women from heart disease.  Setting aside the general
    difficulties of communicating narrow scientific nuances, the latest reports
on estrogen
    therapy are more of an evolution than a revolution.  But that can still
 leave people
    feeling puzzled, worried or even jarred.  Concerns about higher risks of breast
    cancer, heart attack and stroke have complicated women's decisions about hormone therapy
    options during menopause.  At least one expert said women wanting short-term relief
    from hot flashes and other symptoms of menopause should find reassurance in
the latest
    study, which reanalyzed earlier data.  But other experts disagreed. | 
  
    | Female
    Gorillas Go Through Menopause.  [United States] They may not experience hot
    flashes, mood swings, or migraines, but female gorillas reach menopause just
 like human
    women do, according to a new study of gorillas at 17 U.S. zoos.   &
quot;Menopause has
    typically been viewed as a strictly human phenomenon," said Sylvia Atsalis, a
    primatologist at Brookfield Zoo in 
Chicago, Illinois, who co-directed the study. 
    "Now we know that may not be the case."  The findings may not
 only improve
    the care of aging female gorillas but could also shed light on the human female
    reproductive cycle. | 
  
    | Chances a Low-Fat
 Diet Will
    Help? Slim and None.  [United 
States] The largest study ever to
 ask whether a
    low-fat diet reduces the risk of getting cancer or heart disease has found that the diet
    has no effect.  The $415 million federal study involved nearly 49,000 women aged 50
    to 79 who were followed for eight years.  In the end, those assigned to
 a low-fat
    diet had the same rates of breast cancer, colon cancer, heart attacks and strokes as those
    who ate whatever they pleased, researchers reported Wednesday.  "These studies
    are revolutionary," said Dr. Jules Hirsch, physician in chief emeritus
at Rockefeller
    University in New York City, who has spent a lifetime studying the effects of diets on
    weight and health.  "They should put a stop to this era of thinking that we have
    all the information we need to change the whole national diet and make every
body healthy. | 
  
    | Program
    Shines Spotlight on Women's Risk of Heart Disease.  [United States] Like many
    women in America, 
heart disease was the last thing on Carmen Dean-Jackson's mind.  
    But that was before a triple-bypass forced her into an abrupt crash course.
  ''I had
    high cholesterol,'' Dean-Jackson said, ``but I had no symptoms that I thought could be
    caused by any kind of heart problem.''  Dean-Jackson, 67, a retired Miami-Dade public
    school psychologist who currently works as an event planner, has been passionate about
    heart disease awareness ever since her surgery.  ''I had open heart surgery three
    years ago, and ever since then I've been passionate about heart disease awareness,'' said
    Dean-Jackson, a Miami 
resident.  On Saturday Dean-Jackson was the honorary chairwoman
    for Take Heart, a seminar women held in conjunction with the American Heart
Association at
    Macy's Aventura Home Store.  The event was arranged by the Greater Miami Chapter of
    The Links Inc., a national volunteer organization that's been in Miami for more than 50
    years. | 
  
    | No
    Broad Benefit From Calcium Found for Women.  [United States] A
large, seven-year
    study of healthy women over 50 found no broad benefit from calcium and vitamin D
    supplements in preventing broken bones, despite widespread endorsement by doctors for the
    supplements.  The study, whose results are being reported today, also found no
    evidence that the supplements prevented colorectal cancer, and it found an increased risk
    of kidney stones.  The study's leaders said there were hints of benefits for some
    subgroups in the study.  But the supplements' only positive effect in the overall
    study population -- 36,282 healthy women ages 50 to 79 -- was a 1 percent increase in bone
    density at the hip.  The $18 million study was part of the Women's Health Initiative,
    a large federal project that, last week, reported findings that low-fat diets do not
    protect against breast or colorectal cancer or heart disease.  In addition, the
    initiative's study on hormone treatment after menopause showed it had more health risks
    than benefits. | 
  
    | Male Circumcision
    Protects Female Partners From HIV and Other STDs.  [Uganda] A statistical review
    of the past medical files of more than 300 couples in Uganda, in which the female partner
    was HIV negative and the male was HIV positive, provides solid documentation
 of the
    protective effects of male circumcision in reducing the risk of infection among
    women.  Male circumcision also reduced rates of trichomonas and bacterial vaginosis
    in female partners.  The study is believed to be the first to demonstrate the
    benefits to female partners of male circumcision.  Specifically, male circumcision
    reduced by 30 percent the likelihood that the female partner would become infected with
    the virus that causes AIDS, with 299 women contracting HIV from uncircumcised partners and
    only 44 women becoming infected by circumcised men.   Similar reductions in risk were
    observed for the other two kinds of infection, but not for other common STDs, including
    human papillomavirus, syphilis, gonorrhea and Chlamydia.  According to
the Hopkins
    researchers who led the study, Ronald Gray, M.D., and Steven Reynolds, M.D.,
 M.P.H., the
    findings support efforts to assess male circumcision as an effective means of preventing
    HIV infection.  Circumcision is a practice common in North America and
among Jews and
    Muslims, but not generally in Eastern and Southern Africa, Europe or Asia | 
  
    | Teen Girls Using
Pills, Smoking
    More Than Boys.  [United 
States] Teenage girls, having caught up to their male
    counterparts in illegal drug use and alcohol consumption, now have the dubious distinction
    of surpassing boys in smoking and prescription drug abuse.  In the past
 two years, in
    fact, more young women than men started using marijuana, alcohol and cigarettes, according
    to government findings being released today.  The results are doubly disturbing,
    researchers said, because they run counter to trends indicating an overall decline in
    teenage drug use and because young women appear to suffer more serious health consequences
    as a result. | 
  
    | Plump
    Models May Actually Lower Women's Self-Esteem.  [United States]
 Waifish models
    have long been accused of setting unrealistic beauty standards and lowering
self-esteem,
    however, a new study in the March 2006 issue of the Journal of Consumer Research reveals
    that, contrary to many assumptions, looking at moderately heavy models actually lowers
    most women's self-esteem.  "We demonstrated that exposure to thin models does
    not necessarily have a negative impact on one's self-esteem," explain Dirk Smeesters
    (Tilburg University) 
and Naomi Mandel (Arizona State 
University).  "
On the
    contrary, exposure to moderately thin (but not extremely thin) models has a
positive
    impact on one's self-esteem." | 
  
    | New
    Ovarian Cancer Therapy 'Promising'.  [
Australia] A finding that
 a variation in
    treatment greatly increases the survival rates of women with advanced ovarian cancer has
    been called a great step forward by Australian gynaecologists.  The finding that
    women survived an average of 16 months longer if anti-cancer drugs were injected into the
    abdomen has led to immediate adoption of the treatment in the 
United States.  The
    study of more than 400 women found that a combination of intravenous and abdominal
    injections of anti-cancer drugs, significantly improved remission and overall survival
    rates. | 
  
    | Younger
    Women With Hereditary Breast Cancer Risk Tumor in Other Breast.  [Sweden] Younger
    women with non-BRCA hereditary breast cancer are up to six times more likely
 to develop a
    new cancer in the other breast in the next 20 years, when compared with the
general
    population, a new Swedish study finds.  "We did not expect this high rate of new
    tumors in the contralateral breast," said study co-author Dr. Henrik Gronberg, a
    professor of cancer epidemiology and biostatistics at Karolinska Institute in 
Stockholm.
      His team reviewed data from 120 families and 204 women with breast cancer and a
    family history of breast cancer, but not of the type caused by mutations in
the BRCA1 or
    BRCA2 genes, also known to boost breast cancer risk.  Overall, the probability of
    these women getting cancer in the other breast was 5.5 percent at five years
 and up to
    27.3 percent at 20 years -- about six times the expected risk at 20 years.  In
    comparison, the general population's risk of getting a primary breast cancer
 was figured
    at 1.9 percent at five years and 4.9 percent at 20 years, the researchers said. | 
  
    | Women
    More Prone to Headaches.  [England] Women get more headaches than men, due to
    reasons such as stress, poor posture and having cheese and red wine, says a
study.  
    The nine-year-long study also said women were three times more likely to see
 doctors about
    headaches than men.  Martin Gulliford and fellow researchers at the King's College
    London studied consultations and referrals to specialists up to the year 2000 at 253
    general practices in Britain, reported the online edition of Daily Mail.   They found
    6.4 per cent of consultations were for headaches for women, compared with 2.5 per cent for
    men, the study published in the Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry says. | 
  
    | Docs
    More Apt to Pen Headache Script for Women.  [England] Women are
 more likely to
    consult their doctor about headaches or migraine, and are more likely to come away with a
    prescription to treat the problem than are men, according to a study conducted in the 
UK.
      Headache, including migraine, is one of the top 10 reasons for consulting a doctor
    and is the most common neurological symptom encountered by family doctors and
    neurologists, Dr. Martin Gulliford from King's College London and colleagues
 report in the
    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry.  Over a 9-year period in 253
    general practices across the UK, 
there were 570,795 patient-visits for headache made by
    413,221 individuals aged 15 or older, the report indicates.  Women were
 almost three
    times more likely than men to see their doctor about headache symptoms, and
rates for both
    sexes were highest among people 15 to 24 years old. Visits to the doctor because of
    headache decreased with age.  During the 9-year study period, doctors wrote a total
    of 189,065 prescriptions for specific anti-migraine drugs, Gulliford and colleagues
    report.  These drugs were prescribed to about one in three women and to one in four
    men. | 
  
    | Abortions
    at Home are Safe.  [England] Women who are less than nine weeks pregnant can
    safely have medical abortions at home, according to the head of a government-backed pilot
    project.  Abortion services for the 20,000 women who seek a chemically induced
    abortion every year could be transformed should the Department of Health's official
    evaluation of the pilot confirm initial findings.  But it is also likely to provoke
    controversy from anti-abortion campaigners who will claim that home abortions would make
    the procedure easier and therefore lead to more women having terminations. | 
  
    | Sick
    Spouse Bad for Your Health.  [United States] Past research has
shown that the
    spouses of sick people face higher risks of illness and death themselves - a
 phenomenon
    sometimes called the "caregiver burden" or the "bereavement effect".
     But this study examined an extraordinarily large group of couples and
also
    quantified the risk associated with a range of illnesses.  It found that the risk is
    considerable: Men were 4.5 per cent more likely than usual to die on any given day after
    their wives were hospitalised; women with sick husbands were almost three per cent more
    likely to die.  If the sick spouse dies, the partner's risk of death -whether from
    accidents, suicide, infections or pre-existing conditions, such as diabetes
- shoots up
    fivefold, rising by 21 per cent for men and 17 per cent for women, the researchers said. |